The Relevance of Bourdieusian Theory for a “Sociology of Love”
A Critical Discussion
Palabras clave:
bourdieuResumen
The paper starts with the assessment that the Bourdieusian “field approach” has become a central point of reference for contemporary studies on love. It is argued that the reason for this lies within the contribution of Bourdieu’s theory that is able to transcend central theoretical and methodological problems that the phenomenon of love poses to conventional social theory, namely of the status and function of romantic love for late-modern societies. Specifically, Bourdieu’s concepts of symbolic system– habitus, forms of capital and his theory of practice– correspond to problems of conventional social theory in conceptualizing love. Since Bourdieu, however, did not provide a systematic study of love himself, the paper offers a reconstruction of his theory and extrapolates it to the phenomenon of love. The paper proceeds to systemize contemporary Bourdieusian approaches to love. Ultimately, it shows that while Bourdieu’s theory provides a useful lens for studying love as a site of social distinction, it also turns a blind eye to love as a source of intersubjective understanding as well as post-religious transcendence. Accordingly, the paper argues that Bourdieusian theory presents an analytical toolkit rather than a conclusive theory for studying love.
Citas
Abbott, Andrew. 2016. Processual Sociology. New York: Oxford Univserity Press.
Ahmed, Sara. 2006. Queer Phenomenology. Orientations, Objects, Others. Durham/London: Duke University Press.
Ahmed, Sara. 2010. The Promise of Happiness. Durham and London: Duke University Press.
Alexander, Jeffrey. 1996. "The Centrality of the Classics.“ Pp. 21-38 in Social Theory and Sociology: The Classics and Beyond, edited by Stephen P. Turner. Cambridge: Backwell Publishing.
Alexander, Jeffrey C. 1988. "The new theoretical movement.“ Pp. 77-101 in The Handbook of Sociology, editetd by Neil J. Smelser. Newbury Park: Sage Publications.
Bailey, Beth. 1989. From Front Porch to Back Seat: Courtship in Twentieth-Century America. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Beck, Ulrich und Elisabeth Beck-Gernsheim [1990]1995. The Normal Chaos of Love. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Becker, Gary. 1976. The Economic Approach to Human Behaviour. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Beigel, Hugo G. 1951. ”Romantic Love“. American Sociological Review 16(3):326–34.
Berger, Peter L. und Hansfried Keller. 1965. “Die Ehe und die Konstruktion der Wirklichkeit?: Eine Abhandlung zur Mikrosoziologie des Wissens.“ Soziale Welt 16(3): 220–35.
Berman, Marshall. 1982. All That is Solid Melts Into Air: The Experience of Modernity. New York: Penguin Books.
Bethmann, Stephanie. 2013. Liebe?: eine soziologische Kritik der Zweisamkeit. Weinheim, Basel: Beltz Juventa.
Blau, Peter M. 1964. ”Social Exchange“. S. 88–115 in Exchange and Power in Social Life. 30. New York: J. Wiley.
Bourdieu, Pierre. 1977. Outline of a Theory of Practice. UK: Cambridge University Press.
Bourdieu, Pierre. 1979. “Symbolic Power“. Critique of Anthropology 4(13–14): 77–85.
Bourdieu, Pierre. 1983. “The field of cultural production, or: The economic world reversed“. Poetics: 65-74.
Bourdieu, Pierre. [1979]1984. Distinction: A social critique of the judgement of taste. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Bourdieu, Pierre. 1985. “The Market of Symbolic Goods“. Poetics: 13-44.
Bourdieu, Pierre. 1986. “The Forms of Capital“. Pp. 241-258 in Handbook for Theory of Research for the Sociology of Education, edited by J. E. Richardson. Westport: Greenwood Press.
Bourdieu, Pierre. [1986] 2004. “The Biographical Illusion” In: Du Gay, Paul, Jessica Evans and Peter Redman (Ed.): Identity. A Reader, ed. London: Sage Publications: 297-303.
Bourdieu, Pierre. 1990. “Die biographische Illusion“. Bios 3(1): 75–81.
Bourdieu, Pierre and Loïc J. D. Wacquant. [1992] 2006. An Invitation of Reflexive Sociology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Bourdieu, Pierre. 1993. The Field of Cultural Production: Essays on Art and Literature. NY: Columbia University Press.
Bourdieu, Pierre. [1998] 2001. Masculine Domination. Stanford CA: Stanford University Press.
Bourdieu, Pierre. 2004. “The peasant and his body“. Ethnography 5(4): 579–99.
Bourdieu, Pierre. 2008. The Bachelors’ Ball. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Bourdieu, Pierre. 2000. The Social Structures of the Economy. Oxford: Polity Press.
Calhoun, Craig, Edward LiPuma, and Moishe Postone, eds. 1993. Bourdieu: Critical Perspectives. Chicago, Ill.: Univ. of Chicago Press.
Camic, Charles und Neil Gross. 2002. “Contemporary Developments in Sociological Theory: Current Projects and Conditions of Possibility“. Annual Review of Sociology 24(1): 453–76.
Carter, Julia. 2015. “The Sociology of Love“. The Sociological Review.
Collins, Patricia Hill. 1998. “It’s All In the Family: Intersections of Gender, Race, and Nation“. Hypatia, 13: 62-82.
Collins, Randall. 1971. “A Conflict Theory of Sexual Stratification“. Social Problems 19(1):3–21.
Collins, Randall. 2004. Interaction Ritual Chains. UK: Princeton University Press.
Crane, Diana. 1969. “Fashion in Science: Does It Exist?” Social Problems 16 (4): 433–441.
Dahrendorf, Ralf. 1959. Class and Class Conflict in Industrial Society. CA: Stanford University Press.
Dahrendorf, Ralf and Randall Collins. 2006. “Conflict and Critical Theories”. Available on: http://www. pineforge. com/upm-data/13636_Chapter7. pdf. [Accessed on 6th July 2019].
Daniel, Anna. 2017. “Resonanz in der Praxis – eine praxistheoretische Betrachtung.“ In: Christian Helge Peters/Peter Schulz (Ed.): Resonanzen und Dissonanzen. Hartmut Rosas kritische Theorie in der Diskussion. Bielfeld: transcript.
Dixon, Marlene. 1977. “The Subjugation of Women Under Capitalism: The Bourgeois Morality“. Synthesis 1(4): 18–30.
Durkheim, Emile. [1893]1969. The Division of Labor in Society. NY: Macmillan.
Eder, Klaus. 1989. “Klassentheorie als Gesellschaftsanalyse. Bourdieus dreifache kulturtheoretische Brechung der traditionellen Klassentheorie“ in Klassenlage, Lebensstil und kulturelle Praxis. Beiträge zur Auseinandersetzung mit Pierre Bourdieus Klassentheorie, edited by ibid. Franfkfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp: 15–43.
Engels, Friedrich. [1884]1978. “The Origin of the Family, Private Property, and the State“ in The Marx-Engels Reader, edited by Robert C. Tucker. NY: W.W. Norton & Company: 734–59
Federici, Silvia. 1974. ”Wages Against Housework“. Falling Press: 74–87.
Firestone, Shulamith. [1970]1971. The Dialectic of Sex The Case for Feminist Revolution. NY: William Morrow.
Foucault, Michel. [1978]1990. The History of Sexuality. Vol. 1. New York: Random House.
Fraser, Nancy und Rahel Jaeggi. 2018. Capitalism: A Conversation in Critical Theory. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Frevert, Ute, Christian Bailey, Pascal Eitler, Benno Gammerl, Bettina Hitzer, Margrit Pernau, Monique Scheer, Anne Schmidt, and Nina Verheyen. 2014. Emotional Lexicons: continuity and change in the vocabulary of feeling 1700-2000. NY: Oxford Univserity Press.
Gay, Peter. 1984. The Bourgeois Experience: Victoria to Freud. NY: Oxford Univserity Press.
Giddens, Anthony. 1976. ”Classical Social Theory and the Origins of Modern Sociology“. American Journal of Sociology 81(4): 703–29.
Giddens, Anthony. 1984. The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Giddens, Anthony. 1990. Consequences of Modernity. Oxford: Polity Press.
Giddens, Anthony. 1992. The Transformation of Intimacy: Love, Sexuality and Eroticism in modern societies.
Gilman, Charlotte Perkins. [1898]. Women and Economics. GlobalGrey: E-Book.
Goode, William J. 1959. “The Theoretical Importance of Love“. American Sociological Review 24(1): 38.
Green, Adam Isaiah. 2008. “The Social Organization of Desire?: The Sexual Fields Approach.” Sociological Theory 26(1): 25–50.
Greenfield, Sidney M. 1965. “Love and Marriage in Modern America: A Functional Analysis“. Sociological Quarterly 6(4): 361–77.
Gross, Neil. 2005. ”The Detraditionalization of Intimacy Reconsidered“. Sociological Theory 23(3): 286–311.
Gugutzer, Robert. [2005]2013. Soziologie des Körpers. Bielefeld: transcript Verlag.
Habermas, Jürgen. 1984. The Theory of Communicative Action: Reason and the Rationalization of Society. Boston: Beacon Press.
Hakim, Catherine. 2011. Erotic Capital: The Power of Attraction in the Boardroom and the Bedroom. New York: Basic Books.
Hall, John R., Laura Grindstaff, and Ming-cheng M. Lo, eds. 2010. Handbook of Cultural Sociology. London: Routledge.
Haller, Max. 2016. “Was ist Liebe?? Ein wirklichkeitssoziologischer Zugang zu einem“. Kritische Theorie und Gesellschaftsanalyse:153–76.
Henry, Michel. [1963]1973. The Essence of Manifestation. The Hague: Nijhoff.
Henry, Michel. [1975]2012. Philosophy and Phenomenology of the Body. Springer Science & Business Media.
Hill, Paul B. und Johannes Kopp. 2013. Familiensoziologie?: Grundlagen und theoretische Perspektiven. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.
Honneth, Axel. [1992]1995. The Struggle for Recognition: The Moral Grammar of Social Conflicts. Cambridge: Mit Press.
Honneth, Axel. 1995. “The Fragmented World of the Social: Essays in Social and Political Philosophy.“ in The Fragmented World of the Social?: Essays in Social and Political Philosophy., edited by C. W. Wright. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Horkheimer, Max. “Traditional and Critical Theory”, in Paul Connerton (Ed.). Critical Sociology: Selected Readings, Harmondsworth: Penguin, [1937] 1976.
Illouz, Eva. 1998. Consuming the Romantic Utopia: Love and the Cultural Contradictions of Capitalism. Univ of California Press.
Illouz, Eva. 2007. Cold Intimacies: The Making of Emotional Capitalism. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Illouz, Eva. 2012. Why Love Hurts: A Sociological Explenation. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Illouz, Eva. 2018. Warum Liebe endet: Eine Soziologie negativer Beziehungen. Berlin: Suhrkamp Verlag.
Iorio, Gennaro. 2014. “Love in the sociological tradition“. Pp. 33–50 in The Agapic Dimension of Societal Life edited by ibid. UK: Vernon Press.
Iorio, Gennaro, Filipe Campello, and Axel Honneth. 2013. ”Love, society and agape: An interview with Axel Honneth“. European Journal of Social Theory 16(2): 246–58.
Jaspers, Karl. [1964]2009. Leonardo, Descartes, Max Weber: Three Essays. New York: Routledge.
Jayaraj, D. und Sreenivasan Subramanian. 2006. “Horizontal and vertical inequality: Some interconnections and indicators“. Social Indicators Research 75(1): 123–39.
Joas, Hans. 1992. Die Kreativität des Handelns. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
Joas, Hans. 1996. ”Situation - Corporality - Sociality The Fundamentals of a Theory of the Creativity of Action“. The Creativity of Action. Chicago, Ill: University of Chicago Press: 95-145.
Joas, Hans und Wolfgang Knobl. 2009. Social Theory: Twenty Introductary Lectures. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Joas, Hans. 2017. Die Macht des Heiligen. Eine Alternative zur Geschichte von der Entzauberung, Suhrkamp: Berlin.
Johnson, Paul und Steph Lawler. 2005. “Coming Home to Love and Class“. Sociological Research Online 10(3): 10-13.
Kerschbaumer, Sandra. 2018. Immer wieder Romantik?: modelltheoretische Beschreibungen ihrer Wirkungsgeschichte. Heidelberg: Carl-Winter-Universitätsverlag.
Kistenfeger, Jens. 2013. “4. Der positivistische Objektivismus“. Historische Erkenntnis zwischen Objektivität und Perspektivität: 151-204.
Knott, Sarah and Barbara Taylor. 2005. Women, Gender and Enlightenment. UK: Palgrave Macmilan.
Knorr-Cetina, Karin. 1981. “Introduction: The micro-sociological challenge of macro-sociology: towards a reconstruction of social theory and methodology. In: Karin Knorr-Cetina and A.V. Cicourel: Advances in social theory and methodology: toward an integration of micro- and macro-sociologies. Boston: Routledge & Kegan: 1-47.
Koppetsch, Cornelia. 1998. Liebe und Partnerschaft. Gerechtigkeit in modernen Paarbeziehungen. Pp. 111-129 in Liebe am Ende des 20. Jahrhunderts. Studien zur Soziologie intimer Beziehungen, edidted by Katharina Hahn and Gu?nter Burkart. Opladen: Leske + Budrich.
Koppetsch, Cornelia. 2015. „Gefühlte Gleichheit? Gerechtigkeit in Paarbeziehungen“. Pp. 125-133 in (Un-)Gerechte (Un-)Gleichheiten, edited by Steffen Mau and Nadine M. Schöneck. Berlin: Suhrkamp.
Krais, Beate. 1993. “Gender and Symbolic Violence: Female Oppression in the Light of Bourdieu’s Theory of Social Practice.” Pp. 156-177 in Bourdieu: Critical Perspectives, edited by Craig Calhoun, Edward LiPuma and Moishe Postone. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Lapointe, Francois H. 1974. „The Phenomenology of Desire and Love in Sartre & Merleau-Ponty.” Journal of Phenomenological Psychology 4(2): 445–59.
Leacock, Eleanor. 1971. "Introduction to the Origin of the Family, Private Property and the State." Pp. 7-67 in The Origin of the Family, Private Property and the State, edidted by ibid. New York: International Publishers.
Lenz, Karl. [1998]2009. Soziologie der Zweierbeziehung. Eine Einführung. Wiesbaden: VS Springer.
Lenz, Karl and Sylka Scholz. 2014. “Romantische Liebessemantik im Wandel?“ Pp. 93–116 in Familie im Fokus der Wissenschaft, edidted by Anja Steinbach. Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien.
Leschziner, Vanina and Adam Isaiah Green. 2013. „Thinking about food and sex: Deliberate cognition in the routine practices of a field“. Sociological Theory 31(2): 116–44.
Lichtblau, Klaus. [2018]2019. Zur Aktualität von Georg Simmel: Einführung in sein Werk. Wiesbaden: VS Springer.
LiPuma, Edward. 1993. “Culture and the Concept of Culture in a Theory of Practice” Pp. 14-34 in Bourdieu: Critical Perspectives, edited by Craig Calhoun, Edward LiPuma and Moishe Postone. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Lockwood, David. 1992. Solidarity and Schism: „The Problem of Dirsorder“: in Durkheimian and Marxist Sociology. Oxford: Claredon Press.
Luckmann. 1967. The Invisible Religion. The Problem of Religion in Modern Society. New York: Macmillan.
Luhmann, Niklas. [1982]1986. Love as passion: The codification of intimacy. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Luhmann, Niklas. [2008]2010. Love: A sketch. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Luhmann, Niklas. [1997]2012. Theory of society. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Mann, Michael. 2012. The Sources of Social Power. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Manza, Jeff and Michael Alexander McCarthy. 2011.“The Neo-Marxist Legacy in American Sociology.” Annual Review of Sociology 37: 155 -183.
Marcuse, Herbert. [1955]2000. “The Transformation of Sexuality into Eros“. Pp. 197–221 in Eros and Civilization, edidted by ibid. Boston: Beacon Press.
McPherson, Miller, Lynn Smith-Lovin, and James M. Cook. 2001. „Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks“. Annual review of sociology 27(1): 415–44.
Merleau-Ponty, Maurice. [1945]1962. Phenomenology of Perception. London: Routledge.
Nedelmann, Birgitta. 1994. “’Psychologism’ or Sociology of Emotions? Max Weber’s Critique of Georg Simmel’s Sociology. In: Georg Simmel. Critical Assesments. Volume II, edited by David Frisby. New York: Routledge.
De Mul, Jos. 2014. Plessner ’s Philosophical Anthropology. Perspectives and Prospects. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
Owens, Erica. 2007. “The Sociology of Love , Courtship , and Dating“. Pp. 266–71 in 21st Century Sociology, edidted by Cl. D. Bryant and D. L. Peck. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
Paik, Anthony and Adam Isaiah Green. 2014. “Sexual Fields: Toward a Sociology of Collective Sexual Life“. Contemporary Sociology 45(2): 181–83.
Parsons, Talcott. 1935. “The Place of Ultimate Values in Sociological Theory“. International Journal of Ethics 45(3): 282–316.
Parsons, Talcott. [1937]1966. Structure of Social Action. New York: Free Press.
Danielle Petherbridge. 2013. The Critical Theory of Axel Honneth. Lanham: Lexington Books.
Pope, Whitney Cohen Jere and Lawrence E. Hazelrigg. 1975. ”On the Divergence of Weber and Durkheim: A Critique of Parsons’ Convergence Thesis“. American Sociological Review 40(4): 417–27.
Reed, Evelyn. 1969. Problems of Women’s Liberation. New York: Pathfinder Press.
Reiss, Ira L. 1960. ”Toward a Sociology of the Heterosexual Love Relationship“. Source: Marriage and Family Living 22(2): 139–45.
Rosa, Hartmut. 2019. Resonance: A Sociology of our Relationship to the World. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Rosaldo, Michelle Zimbalist. 1974. Woman, Culture, and Society. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Rougemont, Denis de. [1939]1974. Love in the Western World. New York : Harper & Row.
Russell, Arlie Russell. 2003. The Commercialization of Intimate Life. Berkley: University of California Press.
Rusu, Mihai Stelian. 2018. “Theorising love in sociological thought: Classical contributions to a sociology of love.” Journal of Classical Sociology 18(1): 3–20.
Sartre, Jean-Paul. [1943]1966. Being and Nothingness: An essay on phenomenological ontology. New York: Washington Square Press.
Schmitz, Andreas. 2012. “Elective affinities 2.0? A bourdieusian approach to couple formation and the methodology of e-dating.“ Social Science Research on the Internet 1(1): 175–202.
Schmitz, Andreas. 2016. The structure of digital partner choice: A bourdieusian perspective. Switzerland Springer Press.
Schutz, Alfred. 1962. Collected Papers. Volume I: The Problem of Social Reality, edited by M. A. Natanson. Boston London: Martinus Nijhoff.
Schütze, Yvonne. 2008. “Die feinen Unterschiede der Liebe.“ Leviathan 36(1): 76–84.
Sewell, William H. 1992. “A Theory of Structure?: Duality, Agency, and Transformation.“ American Journal of Sociology 98(1): 1–29.
Simmel, Georg. [1997]1984. Georg Simmel: On Women, Sexuality, and Love, edited by Mike Featherstone. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Sorokin Pitrim. [1954]2002. The Ways and Power of Love: Types, Factors, and Techniques of Moral Transformation. Radnor, PA: Templeton Foundation Press.
Sprecher, Susan and Sandra Metts. 1989. “Development of the Romantic Beliefs Scale.“ Journal of Social and Personal Relationships: 387–411.
Swidler, Ann. 1986. “Culture in Action : Symbols and Strategies”. American Sociological Review 51 (2): 273-286.
Swidler, Ann. 2001. Talk of love: How culture matters. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Taylor, Charles. 1993. “To Follow a Rule…” Pp. 45-88 in Bourdieu: Critical Perspectives, edited by Craig Calhoun, Edward LiPuma and Moishe Postone. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Tucker, Robert C. 1978. Marx-Engels Reader. New York: WW Norton & Company.
Tzanakis, Michael. 2013. “Social capital in Bourdieu’s, Coleman’s and Putnam’s theory: empirical evidence and emergent measurement issues“. Educate 13(2): 2–23.
Waller, Willard. 1952. The family?: a dynamic interpretation. Edited by R. Hill. New York: Dryden Press.
Weber, Max. 2000. Religion und Gesellschaft. Frankfurt am Main: Zweitausendeins.
Weber, Max. 2009. From Max Weber, edited by B. S. Turner. New York: Routledge.
Zahavi, Dan. 2010. “Empathy, embodiment and interpersonal understanding: From Lipps to Schutz“. Inquiry 53(3): 285–306.
Zhao, Shanyang. 1993. ”Realms, subfields, and perspectives: On the differentiation and fragmentation of sociology.“ The American Sociologist 24(3–4): 5–14.
Zygmunt, Bauman. 2003. Liquid love: on the frailty of human bonds. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-SinDerivadas 4.0.
Os autores mantêm os direitos autorais e concedem à revista o direito de publicação inicial, com o trabalho simultaneamente licenciado sob a Licença Creative Commons 4.0, Atribuição-Sem Derivações, e pelos direitos de publicação. Os autores podem publicar seus trabalhos on-line em repositórios institucionais / disciplinares ou nos seus próprios sites.
