Subsidies for employee training

a case review for future decisions

Authors

  • THIAGO BOLDRINI Ifes

Keywords:

Subsídios, Incentivos Fiscais, Treinamento

Abstract

Do training grants increase the total hours of training for employees of subsidized companies? The objective of this technical article is to answer this question in an exemplified way, with empirical evidence based on the study by Holzer, Block, Cheatham and Knott (1993). This research was developed to understand the effects of subsidies that governments offer to companies, more specifically, to verify if the subsidies are efficient and meet the purposes for which they were developed. To understand the issues mentioned, it used information from 157 companies in Michigan, USA, in which 66 subsidized and 91 non-subsidized, the model used was based on multiple regression. The results suggest that companies that received subsidies increased training hours per employee. This research contributes to the literature on tax incentives, in addition to presenting the factors that companies should consider when receiving tax incentives from the government.

Author Biography

THIAGO BOLDRINI, Ifes

Doutorando em Ciências Contábeis e Administração. Instituto Federal do Espírito Santo.

References

Aguinis, H., e Kraiger, K. (2009). Benefits of Training and Development for Individuals and Teams, Organizations and Society. Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 451-474.

Chiavenato, I. (2016). Treinamento e desenvolvimento de recursos humanos: como incrementar talentos na empresa. 8 ed. Rev. e atual. Barueri, SP: Manole.

Holzer, H., Block, R., Cheatham, M. e Knott, J (1993). “Are TrainingSubsidies for Firms Effective? The Michigan Experience., Industrial and Labour RelationsReview Vol. 46 pp 625-636.

Ilyas, M., Kadir, K. A. e Adan, Z. (2017). Relationship Between Training and Employee Productivity in Organization: A Partial Least Square (PLS-SEM) Approach. Information and Knowledge Management, v. 7, n. 3.

Jensen, N. M. (2017). The effect of economic development incentives and clawback provisions on job creation: A pre-registered evaluation of Maryland and Virginia programs. Research and Politics, p. 1–8.

Kim, Y. Ployhart, R.E. (2014). The effects of staffing and training on firm productivity and profit growth before, during and after the Great Recession. Journal of Applied Psychology, 99(3), 361-389. DOI: 10.1037/a0035408361.

Kline, P.; Moretti, E.(2014). People, Places and Public Policy: Some Simple Welfare Economics of Local Economic Development Programs,” Annual Review of Economics, v. 6.

Mattsson, P. (2018) The impact of labour subsidies on total factor productivity and profit per employee. Econ. Anal. Policy, in press.

McGehee, W., & Thayer, P. W. (1961). Training in business and industry. Oxford, England: Wiley.

Noe, R.A., Clarke, A.D.M., & Klein, H.J. (2014). Learning in the twenty-first-century workplace. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior,1, 245-275. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-031413-091321.

Peters, A. H.; Fisher, P. S. (2004). The failures of economic development incentives.Journalofthe American Planning Association, v. 70, n. 1, p. 27–37.

Published

2023-05-22

How to Cite

BOLDRINI, T. (2023). Subsidies for employee training: a case review for future decisions . Revista Científica Foz, 5(1), 13. Retrieved from https://revista.ivc.br/index.php/revistafoz/article/view/194

Issue

Section

Artigo de temática livre